Elena Sparger: Intro to Manuscripts Midterm
emsparger
«Previous page
•Page 1
•Page 2
•Page 3
You are here •Page 4 •Page 5 •Page 6 •Page 7 •Page 8 •Page 9 •Page 10 •Page 11 •Page 12 •Page 13 •Page 14 •Page 15 •Page 16 •Page 17 •Page 18 •Page 19 •Page 20 ♦Endnotes »Next page
You are here •Page 4 •Page 5 •Page 6 •Page 7 •Page 8 •Page 9 •Page 10 •Page 11 •Page 12 •Page 13 •Page 14 •Page 15 •Page 16 •Page 17 •Page 18 •Page 19 •Page 20 ♦Endnotes »Next page
117
From the Abbatoir to the Blank Page: The Making of Parchment
As we all know, parchment is derived from the skin of common livestock, which is what gives it its widespread availability. Some different types of skin used to create parchment include calf skin, which is also called vellum, and was considered to produce the best-quality writing support. Others were produced from sheep and goat skin. The type of skin used to make a manuscript can provide clues to its origin. For instance, according to Clemens and Graham, goatskin was a popular material in Italy, whereas sheep and calfskin were more common in manuscripts from northern Europe.
Different aspects of the finished parchment can be used to distinguish between different animal skins. Clemens and Graham give a general guideline for determining calfskin from sheepskin: sheepskin tends to have a yellow tint and may have some shiny or greasy areas on the page, as opposed to calfskin, which is sometimes whiter and may show more obvious veins.
As you can see, in the bottom left corner of the page are some outlines possibly formed by the animal's veins. However, according to Clemens and Graham, these subtle differences between skin types are not totally reliable, as they may have been caused by the process of converting the skin into parchment. To emphasize this, the veins on the leaf could easily be stretchmarks inflicted during production. More detail on the steps parchmenters take from the abbatoir (slaughterhouse) to a blank writing support can be found here:http://web.ceu.hu/medstud/manual/MMM/parchment.html |
(Clemens & Graham p. 9)